AngularJS vs Backbone js vs Ember.js
Backbone: a very promising JS library
Bindings keeps the view and model in sync and avoids defects and edge cases related to data changes. ExtJS scales well with the more complexity – the structure helps keep the codebase maintainable and allows many developers to work with minimal conflicts. AngularJS makes development easier, faster and with far less code that does ExtJS + DeftJS. DeftJS adds a lot to ExtJS, but is limited by the class life-cycle in ExtJS . And DeftJS drives me crazy with wrapping promise resolution in a try-catch block – making simple user errors difficult to track down. AngularJS is much easier to re-use components since UI behavior is wrapped up in small and intuitive directives.
- This is an additional step compared to Epoxy, which completely seperates the model from the bindings and computeds.
- Angular, on the other hand, does not separate the two.
- In Part 2 of this series I will expand on implementing business logic in Backbone and Angular.
- AngularJS has always been pushing the envelop on browser support.
- Ember doesn’t require the code-behind, it might itself tumble to an idea, for example to automatic determination of pathname & controller when determining the source.
As such, programmers can quickly get their data from the site and improve the web product. Developers and business leaders always have to compromise. Just make sure that the benefits of your choice outpower the drawbacks.
The thing is that exceptions are not thrown in angular expressions. And if you use a lot of complex expressions, it’s hard to understand where something goes wrong – it becomes a real pain in the ass. One should transform it into a function & then monitor where something goes wrong. Angular is considered to be quite powerful & more or less self-sufficient framework. GitHub contains a vast number of modules from external developers for all of life’s emergencies. Backbone though leaves it to the developer’s discretion.
NPMCompare is not affiliated with npm, Inc. or the official npm open source project in any way. When comparing those packages you notice thatreact is the more popular package today . The number of tagged questions on Stack Overflow is also an indication of how active a framework’s community is.
The best way to test the templates is to take the code sample. If you look at the diff, you’ll notice that I deleted all of the views and replaced them with nothing. Angular looks at the template and Learn Python Programming Coding Bootcamp figures out how the view should be updated with what kind of dom manipulation, when, and with what data. Dependency injectionA technique where the framework loads modules automatically for you.
- We faced a number of disagreed readers who — quite fairly — argued that project stability and maintainability is a matter of the codebase quality rather than of the tool itself.
- Angular makes it a little harder – although certainly not impossible!
- Instead, their components are trying to be simple UI widgets or components, so the API is much cleaner and easier to understand.
- For example, nested models can be provided by Backbone.DocumentModel, BackBone.NestedTypes, Backbone.Schema, Backbone-Nested, backbone-nestify, just to name a few.
AngularJS vs Backbone.js
It is preferred for Single Page Applications developed using a good combination of HTML and Typescript. With 28 thousand stars on GitHub, the Backbone.js ecosystem used to be huge. You can also always find great solutions in documentation. 9 Good UX Design Examples Every Designer Should See But for now, Backbone.js is considered an aging framework with many newer options available. You will not find a large number of big companies adopting Vue.js in the US, but its popularity in China is imposing.
For this reason, AngularJS is still used by 16.1 percent of respondents to the StackOverflow survey, apparently because of legacy systems that haven’t been migrated. Despite the reasons why AngularJS has such a loyal fan base, it’s important to be aware of complications that come with the framework. See which teams inside your own company are using AngularJS or Backbone.js. Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise.
Difference between Backbone.js and Angular.js
There’s no support of two-way data binding, so you will have to write a lot of code-behind to upgrade the scene when modifying the model & to upgrade the model when modifying the scene. AngularJS is more difficult to scale and requires careful architecture to do so. Angular can also have scaling issues do to limitations of its dirty checking used for binding. If architecture and scoping is done properly, AngularJS is pretty easy to maintain through its modular approach and forcing separation of concerns.
Ember and Angular are still flexible frameworks to some degree but you will find that you could end up fighting the framework if you don’t like the way it does certain things. There are some things that you just need to buy into when using Ember or Angular. CanJS is almost as flexible as Backbone as it allows you to easily integrate other libraries with minimum effort. With CanJS you can even use a totally different rendering engine if you want, I have used Rivets extensively with CanJS without any issues. Although I recommend using what comes with the framework.
Yes, there are lots of plug-ins to compensate for this, but then you will be learning Backbone and something else on top. However, from what I have seen and read CanJS seems to have the edge when it comes to performance, specially in rendering view bindings. On the https://cryptonews.wiki/ other hand I believe that Angular is the less performant based on the fact that it does dirty checking of objects. You can use the mini-templates in underscore for rendering views, but most of the time you will want to use a nicer template engine like Mustache.